Skip to content

phx:help

Recommend the right /phx: command for planning, review, debug, deploy, or test tasks. Use when "which command", "what should I use", or "how do I". NOT for /help.

Plugin Help — Interactive Command Advisor

Helps users find the right command, skill, or agent for their situation.

Usage

/phx:help # Analyze context, suggest commands
/phx:help how do I debug this? # Route to /phx:investigate
/phx:help add a new feature # Route to /phx:plan -> /phx:work

Arguments

  • $ARGUMENTS — optional description of what the user wants to do
  • Empty = analyze current context (git status, existing plans, file patterns)

Execution Flow

Step 1: Gather Context

If $ARGUMENTS is non-empty, use it as primary signal.

Always gather ambient context (run in parallel):

  1. Check for existing plans: use Glob on .claude/plans/*/plan.md — active work in progress?
  2. Check git status: uncommitted changes? which files?
  3. Check for solution docs: use Glob on .claude/solutions/**/*.md — prior knowledge?

Step 2: Classify Intent

Read references/tool-catalog.md for the full routing table.

Map the user’s situation to one of these categories:

CategorySignalsPrimary Commands
Starting outNo plans, new to plugin/phx:intro
Ideation”explore”, “brainstorm”, “not sure”, “how to approach”, “vague idea”/phx:brainstorm
New feature”add”, “build”, “implement”, multi-file/phx:plan/phx:work
Quick changeSingle file, <50 lines, “fix typo”/phx:quick
BugError, stack trace, “broken”, “failing”/phx:investigate
Review”check”, “review”, PR ready/phx:review
Performance”slow”, “N+1”, “memory”/phx:perf, /ecto:n1-check, /lv:assigns
Research”how to”, “best practice”, “evaluate lib”/phx:research
Resume workExisting plan with unchecked tasks/phx:work --continue
Post-fix”that worked”, solved a hard bug/phx:compound
Full cycleLarge feature, new domain area/phx:full
Project health”audit”, “tech debt”, “overall quality”/phx:audit, /phx:techdebt
Deployment”deploy”, “release”, “production”/phx:verify then deploy skill
Permissions”too many prompts”, “allow”, “permission fatigue”/phx:permissions

Step 3: Respond or Clarify

If high confidence (clear match to one category): Present the recommendation with:

  • The command to run (with exact syntax)
  • One-line explanation of what it does
  • What artifacts it creates (if any)
  • Suggested next step after it completes

If medium confidence (2-3 possible matches): Use AskUserQuestion with the top options, each with a one-line explanation.

If low confidence (vague or no signal): Ask ONE focused clarifying question. Examples:

  • “Are you starting something new or continuing existing work?”
  • “Is this a bug fix or a new feature?”
  • “How many files do you expect to change?”

Then recommend based on the answer.

Step 4: Offer Follow-up

After recommending, always add:

  • “Run /phx:help anytime to get routing advice”
  • If they seem new: “Try /phx:intro for a full plugin walkthrough”

Iron Laws

  1. ONE recommendation — don’t dump the full catalog, pick the best match
  2. MAX ONE clarifying question — don’t interrogate, make your best guess
  3. Show exact syntax/phx:plan Add user notifications not just “use the plan command”
  4. Context over keywords — existing plans + git state matter more than word matching
  5. Never block — if user already knows what they want, don’t redirect

Integration

  • Complements intent-detection (auto-trigger) with explicit invocation
  • References same routing logic but adds interactive clarification
  • Can recommend /phx:intro for onboarding

phxagents · v2.8.8 · GitHub · llms.txt · llms-full.txt

Community plugin. Not affiliated with Phoenix Framework or phoenix.new.